Choosing a low-code platform is difficult because similar tools cover different jobs, from internal tools and dashboards to business applications and .NET development, while project health, shipping activity, openness, and licensing vary. This September 2026 comparison uses the supplied current ToolVitals records for each tool.
The ranking is limited to open/source-visible tools and orders them by ToolVitals score descending, then health and shipping for equal composite scores. GitHub stars are context only and do not determine placement.
Rankings
| Rank | Tool | Openness | License | Health | Shipping | GitHub Stars | Score | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ToolJet | OSI-approved OSS | AGPL-3.0 | 98 | 97 | 40831 | 98 | 🟢 Excellent |
| 2 | NocoBase | OSI-approved OSS | Apache-2.0 | 97 | 98 | 24007 | 97 | 🟢 Excellent |
| 3 | Shesha Framework | OSI-approved OSS | Apache-2.0 | 97 | 98 | 508 | 97 | 🟢 Excellent |
| 4 | SuperToolMake | OSI-approved OSS | AGPL-3.0 | 96 | 96 | 4 | 96 | 🟢 Excellent |
| 5 | Grist | OSI-approved OSS | Apache-2.0 | 96 | 95 | 11706 | 96 | 🟢 Excellent |
| 6 | Appsmith | OSI-approved OSS | Apache-2.0 | 96 | 95 | 40804 | 95 | 🟢 Excellent |
| 7 | Baserow | OSI-approved OSS | MIT | 96 | 95 | 5776 | 95 | 🟢 Excellent |
| 8 | Sirius Web | OSI-approved OSS | EPL-2.0 | 96 | 95 | 131 | 95 | 🟢 Excellent |
| 9 | Ivy Framework | OSI-approved OSS | Apache-2.0 | 95 | 96 | 434 | 95 | 🟢 Excellent |
| 10 | Dyad | OSI-approved OSS | Apache-2.0 | 94 | 96 | 21370 | 95 | 🟢 Excellent |
| 11 | Erupt | OSI-approved OSS | Apache-2.0 | 93 | 94 | 2770 | 94 | 🟢 Excellent |
| 12 | Lowdefy | OSI-approved OSS | Apache-2.0 | 94 | 92 | 3005 | 93 | 🟢 Excellent |
| 13 | Convertigo | Open core | AGPL-3.0 | 90 | 90 | 384 | 90 | 🟢 Excellent |
| 14 | Liquio | OSI-approved OSS | AGPL-3.0 | 91 | 87 | 28 | 89 | 🟢 Excellent |
| 15 | Plasmic | OSI-approved OSS | MIT | 91 | 86 | 6986 | 89 | 🟢 Excellent |
| 16 | Typebot | OSI-approved OSS | Apache-2.0 | 89 | 88 | 10308 | 89 | 🟢 Excellent |
| 17 | Saltcorn | OSI-approved OSS | MIT | 90 | 84 | 2065 | 87 | 🟢 Excellent |
| 18 | Skyve | OSI-approved OSS | LGPL-2.1 | 89 | 83 | 502 | 87 | 🟢 Excellent |
| 19 | Steedos | OSI-approved OSS | AGPL-3.0 | 88 | 84 | 1575 | 86 | 🟢 Excellent |
| 20 | JeecgBoot | OSI-approved OSS | Apache-2.0 | 85 | 89 | 47621 | 86 | 🟢 Excellent |
| 21 | Corteza | OSI-approved OSS | Apache-2.0 | 86 | 84 | 2141 | 85 | 🟢 Excellent |
| 22 | MoonShine | OSI-approved OSS | MIT | 85 | 81 | 1301 | 83 | 🟢 Excellent |
| 23 | rebuild | OSI-approved OSS | GPL-3.0 | 83 | 81 | 1061 | 83 | 🟢 Excellent |
| 24 | data primals engine | OSI-approved OSS | MIT | 80 | 82 | 2 | 81 | 🟢 Excellent |
| 25 | UI Builder | OSI-approved OSS | AGPL-3.0 | 77 | 71 | 47 | 75 | 🟢 Good |
| 26 | Oinone | OSI-approved OSS | AGPL-3.0 | 77 | 65 | 2348 | 72 | 🟢 Good |
| 27 | Tego | OSI-approved OSS | Apache-2.0 | 71 | 71 | 1100 | 71 | 🟢 Good |
| 28 | Open Builder | OSI-approved OSS | GPL-3.0 | 66 | 57 | 91 | 63 | 🟢 Good |
| 29 | BESSER | OSI-approved OSS | MIT | 71 | 47 | 186 | 61 | 🟢 Good |
| 30 | Dashjoin | OSI-approved OSS | AGPL-3.0 | 68 | 52 | 154 | 61 | 🟢 Good |
| 31 | Teable | OSI-approved OSS | AGPL-3.0 | 60 | 36 | 21750 | 51 | 🟡 Fair |
| 32 | Form Engine | OSI-approved OSS | MIT | 57 | 41 | 215 | 51 | 🟡 Fair |
| 33 | Latch | OSI-approved OSS | MIT | 53 | 42 | 5 | 49 | 🟡 Fair |
| 34 | ChaiBuilder SDK | OSI-approved OSS | BSD-3-Clause | 51 | 35 | 474 | 45 | 🟡 Fair |
| 35 | Refine | OSI-approved OSS | MIT | 27 | 18 | 35625 | 23 | 🔴 Needs Attention |
| 36 | Lowcoder | OSI-approved OSS | AGPL-3.0 | 35 | 0 | 1609 | 21 | 🔴 Needs Attention |
| 37 | Taipy | OSI-approved OSS | Apache-2.0 | 31 | 5 | 19437 | 21 | 🔴 Needs Attention |
| 38 | AppPlatform | OSI-approved OSS | MIT | 33 | 0 | 1454 | 20 | 🔴 Needs Attention |
| 39 | ILLA Cloud | OSI-approved OSS | Apache-2.0 | 17 | 0 | 12312 | 10 | 🔴 Needs Attention |
| 40 | Totum | OSI-approved OSS | MIT | 17 | 0 | 981 | 10 | 🔴 Needs Attention |
| 41 | Quests | OSI-approved OSS | Apache-2.0 | 14 | 4 | 461 | 10 | 🔴 Needs Attention |
| 42 | Ikiform | OSI-approved OSS | MIT | 15 | 0 | 356 | 9 | 🔴 Needs Attention |
| 43 | Form.aro | OSI-approved OSS | MIT | 13 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 🔴 Needs Attention |
| 44 | CodinIT | OSI-approved OSS | MIT | 12 | 0 | 263 | 7 | 🔴 Needs Attention |
| 45 | OpenSurvey | OSI-approved OSS | AGPL-3.0 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 🔴 Needs Attention |
| 46 | Tinykit | OSI-approved OSS | MIT | 7 | 0 | 519 | 4 | 🔴 Needs Attention |
| 47 | FormSmith | OSI-approved OSS | MIT | 4 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 🔴 Needs Attention |
| 48 | APITable | OSI-approved OSS | AGPL-3.0 | 4 | 0 | 15582 | 2 | 🔴 Needs Attention |
| 49 | Morfibase | OSI-approved OSS | Apache-2.0 | 3 | 0 | 16 | 2 | 🔴 Needs Attention |
| 50 | undb | OSI-approved OSS | AGPL-3.0 | 2 | 0 | 2976 | 1 | 🔴 Needs Attention |
Top 3 Highlights
ToolJet ranks first with a ToolVitals score of 98, a health score of 98, and a shipping score of 97. Its listed scope covers internal tools, dashboards, business applications, workflows, and AI agents through the open-source foundation of ToolJet AI. ToolJet is labeled OSI-approved OSS and AGPL-3.0. Its 40,831 GitHub stars provide context, but they are not part of the ranking.
NocoBase ranks second with a ToolVitals score of 97, a health score of 97, and a shipping score of 98. Its description focuses on an extensible AI-powered no-code/low-code platform for business applications and enterprise solutions. NocoBase is labeled OSI-approved OSS and Apache-2.0. Its 24,007 GitHub stars are contextual only.
Shesha Framework ranks third with a ToolVitals score of 97, a health score of 97, and a shipping score of 98. Its stated focus is an open-source low-code development framework for .NET business applications, giving it a clearly defined technical scope. Shesha Framework is labeled OSI-approved OSS and Apache-2.0. Its 508 GitHub stars are context only.
Want to see the full health, license, shipping, and confidence details for every tool in Low-Code Platforms? Browse all Low-Code Platforms Tools →