Choosing a low-code platform is not just about which builder looks fastest; teams also need to know whether a project is actively maintained, shipping, and usable under a clear license. This July 2026 ToolVitals dataset compares 46 open/source-visible low-code platform tools using health, shipping, openness, license, GitHub stars, and overall ToolVitals score.
The ranking is limited to open/source-visible tools and sorted by ToolVitals score first, with GitHub stars used only as a secondary popularity signal when scores are tied. Openness and license are reported exactly from the data, using each tool’s openness_label and license_label rather than treating every source-visible project as the same kind of open source.
Rankings
| Rank | Tool | Openness | License | Health | Shipping | GitHub Stars | Score | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dyad | OSI-approved OSS | Apache-2.0 | 93 | 98 | 20888 | 96 | 🟢 Excellent |
| 2 | Ivy Framework | OSI-approved OSS | Apache-2.0 | 93 | 98 | 428 | 96 | 🟢 Excellent |
| 3 | BESSER | OSI-approved OSS | MIT | 89 | 92 | 184 | 93 | 🟢 Excellent |
| 4 | Shesha Framework | OSI-approved OSS | Apache-2.0 | 86 | 93 | 503 | 92 | 🟢 Excellent |
| 5 | Sirius Web | OSI-approved OSS | EPL-2.0 | 89 | 87 | 130 | 91 | 🟢 Excellent |
| 6 | SuperToolMake | OSI-approved OSS | AGPL-3.0 | 84 | 98 | 4 | 91 | 🟢 Excellent |
| 7 | Grist | OSI-approved OSS | Apache-2.0 | 85 | 89 | 11257 | 90 | 🟢 Excellent |
| 8 | Lowdefy | OSI-approved OSS | Apache-2.0 | 80 | 81 | 2991 | 86 | 🟢 Excellent |
| 9 | Erupt | OSI-approved OSS | Apache-2.0 | 81 | 84 | 2747 | 85 | 🟢 Excellent |
| 10 | Typebot | OSI-approved OSS | Apache-2.0 | 88 | 67 | 10132 | 84 | 🟢 Excellent |
| 11 | MoonShine | OSI-approved OSS | MIT | 80 | 75 | 1294 | 82 | 🟢 Excellent |
| 12 | Tego | OSI-approved OSS | Apache-2.0 | 84 | 66 | 1098 | 82 | 🟢 Excellent |
| 13 | REI3 | OSI-approved OSS | MIT | 82 | 73 | 567 | 82 | 🟢 Excellent |
| 14 | rebuild | OSI-approved OSS | GPL-3.0 | 81 | 66 | 1019 | 80 | 🟢 Excellent |
| 15 | Latch | OSI-approved OSS | MIT | 69 | 82 | 4 | 79 | 🟢 Good |
| 16 | Saltcorn | OSI-approved OSS | MIT | 71 | 66 | 2029 | 76 | 🟢 Good |
| 17 | Skyve | OSI-approved OSS | LGPL-2.1 | 68 | 69 | 503 | 73 | 🟢 Good |
| 18 | Liquio | OSI-approved OSS | AGPL-3.0 | 69 | 69 | 23 | 73 | 🟢 Good |
| 19 | data primals engine | OSI-approved OSS | MIT | 73 | 48 | 2 | 72 | 🟢 Good |
| 20 | Steedos | OSI-approved OSS | AGPL-3.0 | 66 | 54 | 1567 | 71 | 🟢 Good |
| 21 | Corteza | OSI-approved OSS | Apache-2.0 | 72 | 39 | 2113 | 69 | 🟢 Good |
| 22 | Taipy | OSI-approved OSS | Apache-2.0 | 67 | 43 | 19252 | 68 | 🟢 Good |
| 23 | Form Engine | OSI-approved OSS | MIT | 73 | 34 | 213 | 68 | 🟢 Good |
| 24 | UI Builder | OSI-approved OSS | AGPL-3.0 | 60 | 40 | 42 | 61 | 🟢 Good |
| 25 | Oinone | OSI-approved OSS | AGPL-3.0 | 54 | 27 | 2494 | 55 | 🟡 Fair |
| 26 | ChaiBuilder SDK | OSI-approved OSS | BSD-3-Clause | 60 | 10 | 457 | 54 | 🟡 Fair |
| 27 | Totum | OSI-approved OSS | MIT | 49 | 24 | 984 | 52 | 🟡 Fair |
| 28 | Dashjoin | OSI-approved OSS | AGPL-3.0 | 56 | 7 | 153 | 48 | 🟡 Fair |
| 29 | Ikiform | OSI-approved OSS | MIT | 44 | 7 | 348 | 44 | 🟡 Fair |
| 30 | Form.aro | OSI-approved OSS | MIT | 41 | 7 | 1 | 42 | 🟡 Fair |
| 31 | Quests | OSI-approved OSS | Apache-2.0 | 32 | 10 | 452 | 39 | 🔴 Needs Attention |
| 32 | Dashpress | OSI-approved OSS | AGPL-3.0 | 31 | 0 | 1875 | 35 | 🔴 Needs Attention |
| 33 | Basetool | OSI-approved OSS | Apache-2.0 | 33 | 0 | 284 | 35 | 🔴 Needs Attention |
| 34 | OpenSurvey | OSI-approved OSS | AGPL-3.0 | 33 | 0 | 1 | 35 | 🔴 Needs Attention |
| 35 | CodinIT | OSI-approved OSS | MIT | 30 | 0 | 253 | 34 | 🔴 Needs Attention |
| 36 | ILLA Cloud | OSI-approved OSS | Apache-2.0 | 30 | 0 | 12288 | 33 | 🔴 Needs Attention |
| 37 | vite-vue3-lowcode | OSI-approved OSS | MIT | 32 | 0 | 3410 | 33 | 🔴 Needs Attention |
| 38 | Open Builder | OSI-approved OSS | GPL-3.0 | 27 | 4 | 83 | 32 | 🔴 Needs Attention |
| 39 | LowCode Engine | OSI-approved OSS | MIT | 33 | 0 | 15871 | 31 | 🔴 Needs Attention |
| 40 | Tinykit | OSI-approved OSS | MIT | 24 | 0 | 501 | 31 | 🔴 Needs Attention |
| 41 | AppPlatform | OSI-approved OSS | MIT | 27 | 0 | 1445 | 30 | 🔴 Needs Attention |
| 42 | InstantLand | OSI-approved OSS | GPL-3.0 | 21 | 0 | 52 | 28 | 🔴 Needs Attention |
| 43 | Toola | OSI-approved OSS | Apache-2.0 | 11 | 0 | 245 | 23 | 🔴 Needs Attention |
| 44 | Quanxiang | OSI-approved OSS | Apache-2.0 | 6 | 0 | 135 | 23 | 🔴 Needs Attention |
| 45 | Morfibase | OSI-approved OSS | Apache-2.0 | 8 | 0 | 16 | 22 | 🔴 Needs Attention |
| 46 | FormSmith | OSI-approved OSS | MIT | 0 | 0 | 3 | 20 | 🔴 Needs Attention |
Top 3 Highlights
Dyad ranks first with a ToolVitals score of 96, a health score of 93, and a shipping score of 98. Its 20,888 GitHub stars give it the strongest popularity signal among the tools that share the top score, and the dataset lists it as OSI-approved OSS with an Apache-2.0 license_label.
Ivy Framework also scores 96 overall, matching Dyad on both health score at 93 and shipping score at 98. It has far fewer GitHub stars at 428, which is why it ranks second under the stated tie-breaker, but its scores still put it in the same top performance band; the dataset lists it as OSI-approved OSS with an Apache-2.0 license_label.
BESSER ranks third with a ToolVitals score of 93, supported by an 89 health score and 92 shipping score. Its GitHub star count is modest at 184, so its placement is driven mainly by project vitality rather than popularity; the dataset lists it as OSI-approved OSS with an MIT license_label.
Want to see the full health, shipping, openness, and evidence details for every tool in Low-Code Platforms? Browse all Low-Code Platforms Tools →