Choosing a content management tool means balancing publishing needs with confidence that a project is maintained and usable today. For August 2026, these ToolVitals results compare open/source-visible content management tools using the supplied health, shipping, openness, license, and ToolVitals data.

The supplied ordering uses the ToolVitals score first, then health and shipping to break ties. GitHub stars are context only and do not determine placement.

Rankings

Rank Tool Openness License Health Shipping GitHub Stars Score Status
1 Ghost OSI-approved OSS MIT 98 98 55075 98 🟢 Excellent
2 EmDash CMS OSI-approved OSS MIT 98 97 11997 98 🟢 Excellent
3 Wagtail OSI-approved OSS BSD-3-Clause 97 97 20461 97 🟢 Excellent
4 Grav OSI-approved OSS MIT 97 96 15652 96 🟢 Excellent
5 Orchard Core OSI-approved OSS BSD-3-Clause 97 95 8167 96 🟢 Excellent
6 Alchemy CMS OSI-approved OSS BSD-3-Clause 96 96 907 96 🟢 Excellent
7 Ech0 OSI-approved OSS AGPL-3.0 95 95 2052 95 🟢 Excellent
8 Ycode OSI-approved OSS MIT 94 96 286 95 🟢 Excellent
9 Halo OSI-approved OSS GPL-3.0 94 95 39629 94 🟢 Excellent
10 E107 OSI-approved OSS GPL-3.0 93 96 330 94 🟢 Excellent
11 Conrete CMS OSI-approved OSS MIT 94 91 851 93 🟢 Excellent
12 camaleon-cms OSI-approved OSS MIT 90 95 1238 92 🟢 Excellent
13 Enhavo OSI-approved OSS MIT 89 87 92 88 🟢 Excellent
14 Lektor OSI-approved OSS BSD-3-Clause 79 77 3947 78 🟢 Good
15 Umono OSI-approved OSS MIT 76 75 22 76 🟢 Good
16 Vvveb OSI-approved OSS AGPL-3.0 72 74 1176 73 🟢 Good
17 Microfeed OSI-approved OSS AGPL-3.0 68 60 4052 65 🟢 Good
18 ExpressionEngine OSI-approved OSS Apache-2.0 70 47 505 61 🟢 Good
19 lara-zeus Sky OSI-approved OSS MIT 64 53 213 59 🟡 Fair
20 PrettyBlocks OSI-approved OSS AFL-3.0 50 32 94 43 🟡 Fair
21 Markdown Ninja OSI-approved OSS AGPL-3.0 38 17 415 29 🔴 Needs Attention
22 Changelog OSI-approved OSS MIT 35 20 2768 29 🔴 Needs Attention
23 Microweber OSI-approved OSS MIT 40 10 3436 28 🔴 Needs Attention
24 BlogBowl OSI-approved OSS MIT 37 14 159 28 🔴 Needs Attention
25 Pico CMS OSI-approved OSS MIT 33 10 3904 24 🔴 Needs Attention
26 Squilla OSI-approved OSS GPL-3.0 31 0 1 19 🔴 Needs Attention
27 Markdown Site OSI-approved OSS MIT 17 0 631 10 🔴 Needs Attention
28 Mecha CMS OSI-approved OSS GPL-3.0 16 0 189 10 🔴 Needs Attention
29 Platformus OSI-approved OSS Apache-2.0 3 0 484 2 🔴 Needs Attention
30 Rpub OSI-approved OSS MIT 2 0 62 1 🔴 Needs Attention
31 Puck CMS OSI-approved OSS MIT 0 0 169 0 🔴 Needs Attention
32 StartupEngine OSI-approved OSS MIT 0 0 140 0 🔴 Needs Attention

Top 3 Highlights

Ghost ranks first with a ToolVitals score of 98, a health score of 98, and a shipping score of 98. Its supplied description centers on independent technology for modern publishing, memberships, subscriptions, and newsletters. Ghost is labeled OSI-approved OSS under the MIT license; its 55,075 GitHub stars provide context only.

EmDash CMS ranks second with a ToolVitals score of 98, a health score of 98, and a shipping score of 97. It is described as a full-stack TypeScript CMS based on Astro and as the spiritual successor to WordPress. EmDash CMS is labeled OSI-approved OSS under the MIT license; its 11,997 GitHub stars are context only.

Wagtail ranks third with a ToolVitals score of 97, a health score of 97, and a shipping score of 97. Its supplied description identifies it as a Django content management system focused on flexibility and user experience. Wagtail is labeled OSI-approved OSS under the BSD-3-Clause license; its 20,461 GitHub stars provide context only.

Want to see the full health, license, shipping, and confidence details for every tool in Content Management? Browse all Content Management Tools →