Teams choosing Uptime Monitoring Tools in June 2026 have to balance basic monitoring needs, status page fit, project health, shipping activity, licensing, and community signal. This section uses the supplied ToolVitals ranking data: health score, shipping score, ToolVitals score, GitHub stars, openness_label, license_label, and status for each listed tool.

The ranking is limited to open/source-visible tools and orders them by ToolVitals score first, with GitHub stars used only as a secondary popularity tie-breaker. The list should not be read as a pure popularity chart: smaller projects can rank highly when health and shipping signals are strong, while high-star projects can fall when current scores are weak.

Rankings

Rank Tool Openness License Health Shipping GitHub Stars Score Status
1 Uptime Kuma OSI-approved OSS MIT 94 83 88053 92 🟢 Excellent
2 Uptimekit OSI-approved OSS MIT 87 95 72 91 🟢 Excellent
3 Checkmate OSI-approved OSS AGPL-3.0 84 87 10039 88 🟢 Excellent
4 Healthchecks OSI-approved OSS BSD-3-Clause 83 67 10095 81 🟢 Excellent
5 Harbour Space Status OSI-approved OSS MIT 64 61 0 69 🟢 Good
6 Arki Uptime OSI-approved OSS MIT 62 63 0 68 🟢 Good
7 Uni Status OSI-approved OSS AGPL-3.0 74 36 4 67 🟢 Good
8 Fettle OSI-approved OSS Apache-2.0 59 63 277 66 🟢 Good
9 Telegai Status OSI-approved OSS MIT 57 63 0 66 🟢 Good
10 Uptimer OSI-approved OSS MIT 65 49 466 65 🟢 Good
11 StackPatrol OSI-approved OSS MIT 56 49 1 64 🟢 Good
12 OpsKnight OSI-approved OSS Apache-2.0 64 31 16 62 🟢 Good
13 Reachable OSI-approved OSS AGPL-3.0 54 51 3 62 🟢 Good
14 UptimeMonitor Server OSI-approved OSS GPL-3.0 60 30 64 60 🟢 Good
15 Status Page Aggregator OSI-approved OSS MIT 56 32 21 58 🟡 Fair
16 Warden OSI-approved OSS AGPL-3.0 55 27 3 57 🟡 Fair
17 Upstat OSI-approved OSS MIT 62 21 198 56 🟡 Fair
18 PongHub OSI-approved OSS MIT 59 0 227 47 🟡 Fair
19 Model Status OSI-approved OSS MIT 46 17 43 47 🟡 Fair
20 Stremio Status OSI-approved OSS GPL-3.0 44 10 59 44 🟡 Fair
21 STS OSI-approved OSS Apache-2.0 46 14 24 43 🟡 Fair
22 Pongo OSI-approved OSS MIT 33 4 30 39 🔴 Needs Attention
23 Aether Status OSI-approved OSS Apache-2.0 41 0 0 39 🔴 Needs Attention
24 ClearStatus OSI-approved OSS Apache-2.0 36 0 1 37 🔴 Needs Attention
25 Statping OSI-approved OSS GPL-3.0 36 0 7285 34 🔴 Needs Attention
26 StatusNook OSI-approved OSS MIT 28 0 973 34 🔴 Needs Attention
27 Squzy OSI-approved OSS BSD-3-Clause 30 0 480 31 🔴 Needs Attention
28 Status Page OSI-approved OSS Apache-2.0 27 0 74 31 🔴 Needs Attention
29 Cloudflare Workers Status Page OSI-approved OSS MIT 19 0 2800 30 🔴 Needs Attention

Top 3 Highlights

Uptime Kuma ranks first with a 92 ToolVitals score, 94 health score, and 83 shipping score. Its status is 🟢 Excellent, making it the clear top-ranked option in this dataset.

Uptimekit ranks second with a 91 ToolVitals score, just one point behind Uptime Kuma. Its standout number is the 95 shipping score, the highest shipping score in the ranking, while its GitHub star count is much smaller at 72. It is listed as OSI-approved OSS under the MIT license and has 🟢 Excellent status, so its placement is driven by ToolVitals health and shipping signals rather than popularity.

Checkmate ranks third with an 88 ToolVitals score, 84 health score, and 87 shipping score. It is listed as OSI-approved OSS under the AGPL-3.0 license and has 10,039 GitHub stars, giving it both a strong ToolVitals score and a large community signal. The supplied description positions it around server hardware, uptime, response times, incidents, and real-time visualizations.

Want to see the full health, shipping, openness, and evidence details for every tool in Uptime Monitoring? Browse all Uptime Monitoring Tools →