Choosing file storage software means separating broad collaboration platforms, self-hosted personal clouds, distributed object storage, and focused sharing tools. This ranking uses ToolVitals health, shipping, openness, license, and GitHub popularity data for July 2026.
The list includes open/source-visible tools and ranks them by ToolVitals score, with GitHub stars used as the secondary popularity signal. Puter, Nextcloud, and Storj each score 98, so their supplied GitHub star counts determine their order.
Rankings
| Rank | Tool | Openness | License | Health | Shipping | GitHub Stars | Score | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Puter | OSI-approved OSS | AGPL-3.0 | 98 | 95 | 42797 | 98 | 🟢 Excellent |
| 2 | Nextcloud | OSI-approved OSS | AGPL-3.0 | 95 | 100 | 36232 | 98 | 🟢 Excellent |
| 3 | Storj | OSI-approved OSS | AGPL-3.0 | 96 | 100 | 3269 | 98 | 🟢 Excellent |
| 4 | OpenCloud | OSI-approved OSS | Apache-2.0 | 90 | 100 | 5733 | 96 | 🟢 Excellent |
| 5 | Owncloud | OSI-approved OSS | AGPL-3.0 | 87 | 87 | 8814 | 90 | 🟢 Excellent |
| 6 | OxiCloud | OSI-approved OSS | MIT | 88 | 93 | 3421 | 90 | 🟢 Excellent |
| 7 | Sync-in Server | OSI-approved OSS | AGPL-3.0 | 81 | 90 | 1582 | 89 | 🟢 Excellent |
| 8 | Slink | OSI-approved OSS | AGPL-3.0 | 86 | 84 | 1561 | 88 | 🟢 Excellent |
| 9 | CloudFlare ImgBed | OSI-approved OSS | MIT | 80 | 81 | 5717 | 83 | 🟢 Excellent |
| 10 | Emberly | OSI-approved OSS | AGPL-3.0 | 68 | 84 | 4 | 81 | 🟢 Excellent |
| 11 | Cloudreve | OSI-approved OSS | GPL-3.0 | 80 | 58 | 28369 | 77 | 🟢 Good |
| 12 | Papermark | OSI-approved OSS | AGPL-3.0 | 67 | 51 | 8812 | 70 | 🟢 Good |
| 13 | Seafile | OSI-approved OSS | GPL-2.0 | 78 | 28 | 15004 | 65 | 🟢 Good |
| 14 | Filestash | OSI-approved OSS | AGPL-3.0 | 54 | 54 | 14398 | 62 | 🟢 Good |
| 15 | LocalSend | OSI-approved OSS | Apache-2.0 | 67 | 14 | 85577 | 55 | 🟡 Fair |
| 16 | Spacedrive | OSI-approved OSS | Apache-2.0 | 42 | 18 | 38618 | 47 | 🟡 Fair |
| 17 | MinIO | OSI-approved OSS | AGPL-3.0 | 46 | 0 | 61357 | 45 | 🟡 Fair |
Top 3 Highlights
Puter ranks first with a ToolVitals score of 98, a health score of 98, a shipping score of 95, and 42,797 GitHub stars. Its official repository positions it as a self-hostable internet computer rather than a file-only service, making cloud storage part of a broader application platform. Puter is labeled OSI-approved OSS under AGPL-3.0.
Nextcloud ranks second with a ToolVitals score of 98, a health score of 95, a shipping score of 100, and 36,232 GitHub stars. Its official Files page describes storage, synchronization, sharing, and collaboration through web, desktop, and mobile clients, with on-premises, cloud, and hybrid deployment options. Nextcloud is labeled OSI-approved OSS under AGPL-3.0.
Storj ranks third with a ToolVitals score of 98, a health score of 96, a shipping score of 100, and 3,269 GitHub stars. Its official product page positions it as distributed cloud object storage with S3 compatibility and end-to-end encryption for data and metadata, making it more infrastructure-oriented than Puter or Nextcloud. Storj is labeled OSI-approved OSS under AGPL-3.0.
Want to see the full health, shipping, openness, and evidence details for every tool in File Storage & Sharing? Browse all File Storage & Sharing Tools →