Infrastructure as code teams are usually choosing between tools that solve different parts of the same problem: defining infrastructure, orchestrating Terraform or OpenTofu workflows, managing Kubernetes configuration, or wrapping deployment risk checks around changes. ToolVitals compares the supplied Infrastructure as Code Tools using health score, shipping score, openness, license, stars, pricing scope, and an overall ToolVitals score for May 2026.
This ranking includes only open or source-visible tools from the supplied dataset. The order is ToolVitals score descending, with GitHub stars used only as a secondary popularity signal for ties; openness_label and license_label are reported as given, without treating non-OSI models as OSI open source.
Rankings
| Rank | Tool | Openness | License | Health | Shipping | GitHub Stars | Score | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SST | OSI-approved OSS | MIT | 94 | 100 | 25969 | 94 | 🟢 Excellent |
| 2 | Pulumi | OSI-approved OSS | Apache-2.0 | 100 | 100 | 25182 | 94 | 🟢 Excellent |
| 3 | Meshery | OSI-approved OSS | Apache-2.0 | 100 | 100 | 10229 | 94 | 🟢 Excellent |
| 4 | Terrateam | OSI-approved OSS | MPL-2.0 | 97 | 100 | 1225 | 94 | 🟢 Excellent |
| 5 | Atmos | OSI-approved OSS | Apache-2.0 | 91 | 100 | 1295 | 93 | 🟢 Excellent |
| 6 | Terragrunt | OSI-approved OSS | MIT | 92 | 100 | 9566 | 90 | 🟢 Excellent |
| 7 | OpenTofu | OSI-approved OSS | MPL-2.0 | 93 | 76 | 28640 | 89 | 🟢 Excellent |
| 8 | Crossplane | OSI-approved OSS | Apache-2.0 | 92 | 88 | 11665 | 89 | 🟢 Excellent |
| 9 | Terramate | OSI-approved OSS | MPL-2.0 | 89 | 88 | 3581 | 87 | 🟢 Excellent |
| 10 | ProxmoxVE Scripts | OSI-approved OSS | MIT | 95 | 100 | 28009 | 86 | 🟢 Excellent |
| 11 | Stelvio | OSI-approved OSS | Apache-2.0 | 79 | 62 | 278 | 77 | 🟢 Good |
| 12 | pyinfra | OSI-approved OSS | MIT | 81 | 56 | 5645 | 75 | 🟢 Good |
| 13 | DeployWhisper | OSI-approved OSS | MIT | 77 | 56 | 9 | 72 | 🟢 Good |
| 14 | Monokle | OSI-approved OSS | MIT | 52 | 0 | 2132 | 42 | 🟡 Fair |
| 15 | NginxConfig | OSI-approved OSS | MIT | 45 | 0 | 28303 | 37 | 🔴 Needs Attention |
| 16 | OpenQRM Community | OSI-approved OSS | GPL-2.0 | 30 | 0 | 11 | 31 | 🔴 Needs Attention |
Top 3 Highlights
SST ranks first with a ToolVitals score of 94, a health score of 94, and a shipping score of 100. It is listed as OSI-approved OSS under the MIT license, with no pricing scope reported and 25,969 GitHub stars. Among the tools tied at a 94 ToolVitals score, SST leads on the ranking because GitHub stars are used as the secondary tie-breaker.
Pulumi also scores 94 overall and has perfect 100 health and 100 shipping scores in the supplied data. It is OSI-approved OSS under Apache-2.0, with no pricing scope reported and 25,182 GitHub stars. Its main distinction in this list is that it pairs top health and shipping marks with broad infrastructure-as-code positioning across programming languages.
Meshery is another 94-score tool, with 100 health and 100 shipping scores. It is OSI-approved OSS under Apache-2.0, has no pricing scope reported, and has 10,229 GitHub stars. In this set, it stands out as the highest-ranked cloud native management option after SST and Pulumi.
Want to see the full details, pricing, and trend data for every tool in Infrastructure as Code? Browse all Infrastructure as Code Tools →