Readers comparing content management tools need a clear way to distinguish publishing-focused products, framework-based systems, and projects with different levels of current activity. This September 2026 snapshot uses ToolVitals scores, health and shipping scores, openness and license labels, and GitHub stars as context.

The ranking covers open/source-visible tools and orders them by ToolVitals score, then uses health and shipping to break ties. GitHub stars provide context only and do not determine the ordering.

Rankings

Rank Tool Openness License Health Shipping GitHub Stars Score Status
1 Ghost OSI-approved OSS MIT 98 98 55274 98 🟢 Excellent
2 EmDash CMS OSI-approved OSS MIT 98 97 12287 98 🟢 Excellent
3 Wagtail OSI-approved OSS BSD-3-Clause 97 97 20498 97 🟢 Excellent
4 Grav OSI-approved OSS MIT 97 96 15665 97 🟢 Excellent
5 Alchemy CMS OSI-approved OSS BSD-3-Clause 95 96 906 96 🟢 Excellent
6 Orchard Core OSI-approved OSS BSD-3-Clause 96 94 8179 95 🟢 Excellent
7 Ech0 OSI-approved OSS AGPL-3.0 95 95 2053 95 🟢 Excellent
8 Halo OSI-approved OSS GPL-3.0 95 94 39717 95 🟢 Excellent
9 Ycode OSI-approved OSS MIT 94 96 304 95 🟢 Excellent
10 Conrete CMS OSI-approved OSS MIT 93 90 851 92 🟢 Excellent
11 E107 OSI-approved OSS GPL-3.0 90 95 331 92 🟢 Excellent
12 camaleon-cms OSI-approved OSS MIT 90 95 1236 92 🟢 Excellent
13 Microfeed OSI-approved OSS AGPL-3.0 87 93 4076 89 🟢 Excellent
14 Enhavo OSI-approved OSS MIT 90 86 92 88 🟢 Excellent
15 Umono OSI-approved OSS MIT 70 70 22 70 🟢 Good
16 ExpressionEngine OSI-approved OSS Apache-2.0 68 45 505 59 🟡 Fair
17 Changelog OSI-approved OSS MIT 63 44 2768 55 🟡 Fair
18 Lektor OSI-approved OSS BSD-3-Clause 58 41 3947 51 🟡 Fair
19 lara-zeus Sky OSI-approved OSS MIT 50 30 213 42 🟡 Fair
20 PrettyBlocks OSI-approved OSS AFL-3.0 46 31 94 40 🟡 Fair
21 Vvveb OSI-approved OSS AGPL-3.0 44 26 1187 37 🔴 Needs Attention
22 Microweber OSI-approved OSS MIT 38 10 3437 27 🔴 Needs Attention
23 Markdown Ninja OSI-approved OSS AGPL-3.0 34 15 415 27 🔴 Needs Attention
24 BlogBowl OSI-approved OSS MIT 34 13 159 26 🔴 Needs Attention
25 Pico CMS OSI-approved OSS MIT 31 10 3905 22 🔴 Needs Attention
26 Squilla OSI-approved OSS GPL-3.0 27 0 1 16 🔴 Needs Attention
27 Markdown Site OSI-approved OSS MIT 15 0 630 9 🔴 Needs Attention
28 Mecha CMS OSI-approved OSS GPL-3.0 15 0 189 9 🔴 Needs Attention
29 Platformus OSI-approved OSS Apache-2.0 3 0 484 2 🔴 Needs Attention
30 Rpub OSI-approved OSS MIT 2 0 62 1 🔴 Needs Attention
31 Puck CMS OSI-approved OSS MIT 0 0 170 0 🔴 Needs Attention
32 StartupEngine OSI-approved OSS MIT 0 0 141 0 🔴 Needs Attention

Top 3 Highlights

Ghost ranks first with a ToolVitals score of 98, health and shipping scores of 98, and a 🟢 Excellent status. Its supplied description centers on independent technology for modern publishing, memberships, subscriptions and newsletters. Ghost is labeled OSI-approved OSS and MIT; its 55,274 GitHub stars add context but do not determine the ranking.

EmDash CMS ranks second with a ToolVitals score of 98, health of 98, shipping of 97, and a 🟢 Excellent status. It is described as a full-stack TypeScript CMS based on Astro and as the spiritual successor to WordPress. Its labels are OSI-approved OSS and MIT, while its 12,287 GitHub stars are context only.

Wagtail ranks third with a ToolVitals score of 97, health and shipping scores of 97, and a 🟢 Excellent status. The supplied description identifies it as a Django content management system focused on flexibility and user experience. Wagtail is labeled OSI-approved OSS and BSD-3-Clause; its 20,498 GitHub stars provide context rather than ranking weight.

Want to see the full health, license, shipping, and confidence details for every tool in Content Management? Browse all Content Management Tools →